Posted by Bill Streeter in Lucy and Nancys Common Sense Compliance
If you needed any more hints that fair-lending is becoming the new hot topic, the latest “news” that the FFIEC has revised and expanded the Interagency Fair-lending Examination Procedures is one giant clue.
I put the term “news” in quotations, because it wasn’t exactly a loud pronouncement from the regulatory agencies that the revision had been made. Nothing in the Federal Reserve Board or OCC or FDIC or FFIEC announcements about it. The Federal Reserve Board issued a Consumer Affairs Letter on Aug. 4 to officers and managers in charge of Consumer Affairs sections of the Federal Reserve System. If you just look at the agencies’ “What’s New” or press releases for happenings, you would have missed it.
The revised exam procedures update the fair-lending exam procedures that were originally issued by the agencies in 1999. According to the Fed’s Consumer Affairs letter, the revised procedures particularly clarify procedures relating to pricing; the practices of steering and redlining; and broker relationships. They reflect the current environment and fair-lending concerns especially relating to subprime lending and nontraditional mortgage products.
In the previous exam procedures, there were 49 risk factors in the categories of Compliance Program, Overt Discrimination, Underwriting, Pricing, Redlining, Steering, and Marketing of Residential Products. In the new exam procedures, there are 55 risk factors in these same categories. In addition to new risk factors, many of the existing risk factors have been expanded and clarified.
An institution’s compliance program, for example, represents seven fair-lending risk factors–or places where an institution has potential risk of fair-lending criticism. That’s one more than before. The new risk factor focuses on an institution’s training program. A weak or nonexistent fair-lending training program presents a fair-lending risk to the institution. The size, scope, and quality of the compliance program, including senior management involvement, was a fair-lending risk. That has now been expanded to also include the designation of a compliance officer and staffing.Have the regulators been noticing that financial institutions have been short-changing the staff count for fair-lending compliance lately? Maybe they all got re-assigned to the Bank Secrecy Act Department in recent years? Fair-lending problems previously found in an institution’s products was a compliance program risk factor. That risk factor has now been expanded to include fair-lending problems found in any of the institution’s subsidiaries as well.
Some of the other new and expanded risk factors in the categories of redlining, steering, and pricing introduce the concept of significant differences in higher-priced loans and nontraditional mortgage loans with negative effects (negative amortization, prepayment penalties, no escrows) in minority populations or areas with higher concentrations of minority populations. These aren’t new concepts, however. The regulators have been issuing warnings and advisories about such practices for years. They are now in the examination procedures.
Some of the new risk factors under the Redlining category pull in Community Reinvestment Act concepts. This makes sense because fair-lending performance has a strong correlation with CRA performance. How an institution’s assessment area is defined can be a fair-lending risk. A CRA assessment area drawn to exclude areas with relatively high concentrations of minority residents is a fair-lending risk factor. Having branch locations in minority neighborhoods that are opened for fewer hours a week than branch locations in non-minority neighborhoods is a risk factor.
That’s just a sampling of what’s new and improved in the fair-lending exam procedures. I highly recommend taking the new list of fair-lending risk factors (even those that aren’t new) and conducting a risk assessment to see where your institution has risk. Make it a priority. The regulators certainly are.
About Nancy Derr-Castiglione
“Lucy and Nancy’s Common Sense Compliance” is blogged by both Lucy Griffin and Nancy Derr-Castiglione, both ABA Banking Journal contributing editors on compliance.
Nancy, a Certified Regulatory Compliance Manager, is owner of D-C Compliance Services, an independent regulatory compliance consulting services business that has provided expertise in compliance training, monitoring, risk assessment, and policies and procedures to financial institutions since 2002.
Previously, Nancy held compliance positions with Bank One Corporation and with United Banks of Colorado.
In addition to serving as a Contributing Editor of ABA Banking Journal, Nancy has served on the ABA Compliance Executive Committee; National and Graduate Compliance Schools board; conference planning committees, and the Editorial Advisory Board for the ABA Bank Compliance magazine.
She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org
Compliance Officers: Don't miss ABA BJ's online coverage of ABA's 2009 Regulatory Compliance Conference. Click here
Community Bank Compliance Officers: Be sure to check out our other compliance blog, "AML, Fraud, and Other Things." BSA expert John Byrne blogs on money-laundering and related matters with a definite point of view. Check it out
For ABA Member Banks Only: Get regular compliance news updates with ABA's Compliance Source E-Letter
ABA member-bank employees have access to almost three dozen ABA news and information e-bulletins on important industry topics. One e-bulletin, THE Compliance Source, is dedicated to becoming your source for compliance information in the electronic world. Compliance Source is published each Monday throughout the year. In this changing regulatory environment, every compliance professional should subscribe THE Compliance Source. It will link you to recent compliance developments and alert you to upcoming compliance events. In addition to regular sections on "What's New in Review" and "On the Compliance Horizon," THE Compliance Source will have rotating sections including analysis of compliance issues by ABA staff in the "ABA Reports" section.
For a sample newsletter, click here.
To subscribe, click here