Menu
ABA Banking Journal Home
Menu

Are we all doing enough?

“You gotta fight every day to keep mediocrity at bay”*

Are we all doing enough?

Van Morrison remains a prolific singer-songwriter and this line from a 2005 song reminds me that all too often we seem comfortable with the status quo. Or worse, we complain, yet do nothing about the issue or theme that troubles us.

Message in OCC’s Semiannual Risk Perspective

What does this new report actually tell us?

During a recent webinar I moderated with two AML veterans, Rick Small and Dan Soto, we spent some time discussing themes from the OCC’s report. While the report concludes that MRAs (“matters requiring attention”) and AML enforcement actions were down, it went on to point out:

“Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and anti–money laundering (AML) risks remain prevalent given changing methods of money laundering and growth in the volume and sophistication of electronic banking fraud. BSA/AML risk has increased among community banks during 2012–2013, resulting from increases in the number of higher-risk, cash-intensive customers and internationally oriented transactions. In addition, BSA programs at some banks have failed to evolve or incorporate appropriate controls into new products and services. A lack of resources and expertise devoted to BSA/AML risk management in some banks often compounds these issues.”

I have to say these conflicting messages troubled all three of us.

First, we all remain skeptical that MRAs are actually down, given the anecdotal information that formal criticisms (of all kinds) appear to be on the rise.

Also, with the risk increase mentioned above, what support will AML professionals receive from the government about the risks with new money laundering methods? Are banks and other financial institutions doing all of this in a vacuum? I certainly think that continues mediocrity in compliance.

The correct point regarding community banks getting more high-risk clients that they really cannot manage because large banks have “de-risked” their customer bases needs some guidance from the regulators—not just a calling out of the problem.

Note: I am not suggesting that OCC and others have not offered any suggestions or “guidance” on de-risking, but that that guidance does not seem to be slowing the activity. For example, a clear document on “controls” for new products and services would be greatly welcomed by the AML community.

Final point on the program with Rick and Dan (Rick from American Express and Dan from Ally Financial)—both are clearly facing the challenges many of you are dealing with and when asked about the very serious issue of personal liability, they offered their views (grist for another blog mill this summer) but said they are enjoy their jobs and how they (and all of you) make a difference in combating money laundering and financial crime—keeping mediocrity at bay.

[Editor’s note: Soto moderated a discussion panel at ABA’s Regulatory Compliance Conference recently where the issue of personal liability was addressed.)

Strong statement regarding human trafficking

It is refreshing to read government reports that compliment the AML community without caveat. One such report was released this month by the U.S. State Department. The Trafficking in Persons Report 2014 reviews country responses to the more than 20 million people impacted by human trafficking.

The report provides extensive detail and should be a must-read for all of us. In one section, the report points to the need for identifying irregular transactions and acknowledges the work of FinCEN in conducting a similar initiative, begun by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office with several major financial institutions to determine what “red flags” could be indicators of this horrific crime.

The institutions noted are Bank of America, American Express, TD Bank, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Western Union. It should also be mentioned that the Department of Homeland Security first developed the idea of working closely with the private sector in creating case studies and typologies to better equip all of the AML community to better understand how best to report financial activity that could be indicators.

All of the financial institutions involved are engaged in these projects because they recognize the societal impact of human trafficking. Their effort is not some regulatory response—again, keeping mediocrity at bay.

John Byrne

John Byrne is Executive Vice-President of the Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists. ACAMS, with more than 17,000 members, develops anti-money laundering/sanctions/financial crime detection programs and certifies specialists in financial and non-financial businesses and government agencies. Byrne is a nationally known regulatory and legislative attorney with close to 30 years of experience in a vast array of financial services issues, with particular expertise in all aspects of regulatory oversight, policy and management, anti-money laundering (AML), privacy, and consumer compliance. He has written over 100 articles on AML; represented the banking industry in this area before Congress, state legislatures and international bodies such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF); and appeared on CNN, Good Morning America, the Today Show, and many other media outlets. John has received a number of awards, including the Director's Medal for Exceptional Service from the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) and the ABA's Distinguished Service Award for his career work in the compliance field. Byrne can be e-mailed at jbyrne@acams.org.
 
And don't miss John's updates on Twitter! You can find him at @jbacams2011.  Click here to see his wefollow Twitter page.  

back to top

Sections

About Us

Connect With Us

Resources