PEOPLE COSTS: HOW IS YOUR BANK KEEPING THEM DOWN?

The Headache: Controlling "people costs"

Our question:  What is your bank doing to contain personnel costs?

Come share your ideas, pick up a few! 

 

One' banker's remedy: Meeting two "stretch goals" at First United Bank & Trust
 
Here's how William Grant "passed the aspirin." He's chairman and CEO, First United Bank & Trust, $1.6 billion-assets, Oakland, Md.

We are involving nearly everyone in our effort to control salaries and benefits costs. Next to interest, it is our biggest expense.

We have set out two very broad stretch goals, which are easy to understand, and enable all to observe our progress.

The first is that we want to maintain our FTE count equal to where we were at the end of 2008. This is a tough goal, as we have opened two new branches, hired a handful of specialists, and acquired an insurance agency during the course of this year. That said, everyone has been pulling together and has resisted the temptation to automatically replace a position when vacated. In several instances, we have replaced full-time associates who have left with a part-timer. In light of this, the goal is still a stretch, but achieving it is within sight.

The second goal was to reduce our overtime by 66%. We are tracking that monthly, on a department-by-department basis. Because of this close examination, and through everyone’s cooperation, we are actually ahead of our goal on this.

This blog was adapted from the September 2009 print version of "Pass the Aspirin."
 
Now let's hear your ideas!
 
(Editorial Note: Contributions to Pass the Aspirin may also appear in our print edition.  While we will ask for your e-mail address, this is only as an aid to verifying identity and will not be used for any marketing or promotional purpose. The e-mail address will not be published.)
 
For vintage Aspirin columns, go to www.passtheaspirinplus.com
To suggest new topics for Pass the Aspirin both in print and in this blog, please e-mail This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

J. Edward Norriss II said:

We?re selling a branch and closing a branch. Beyond that, we?re really looking at our overall staffing needs throughout the bank. It?s very hard personally to relocate or discharge loyal employees because of this economy. We have made every effort to utilize our present staff, through reassignments or adding new responsibilities. We?re not replacing employees who leave, for whatever reason. We have temporarily suspended salary increases and some benefit payments, trying to keep from laying off staff.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Blair Hillyer said:

We haven?t replaced a couple people that left the bank, partly to control costs and partly due to a slowdown in business during this recession. We also didn?t give pay raises this year, for the first time in many years. Less staff, a lack of additional compensation, and overall turmoil in the banking industry has contributed to employee burnout, and morale is probably the worst in years. We have tried to convey a positive attitude and emphasized the new opportunities for our bank in the current economic climate. We have also reminded our staff that no one has been downsized at our bank during this crisis. It has been a difficult struggle, however.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Karen Cameron said:

Our bank and its holding company are managing personnel costs through attrition, better schedule management, and limiting overtime. All departments are being challenged to assess workflow and make sure that staff needs are current and overtime is limited. As employees terminate, those positions are not necessarily being replaced.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Mary Kay Bates said:

Bank Midwest has taken two specific steps to help contain personnel costs. Both are viewed as long-term measures designed to improve and sustain staffing efficiency.
First, non-exempt weekly work schedules have been implemented as a means towards moving away from a traditional 8:00 to 5:00 (40-hour per week) work schedule. Supervisors are held accountable for staffing schedules that are based upon high/low work volumes throughout the course of a day and month. These employees understand that their work week may vary between 30 to 40 hours per week based upon staffing needs.
Second, we?ve placed closer scrutiny on overtime expense and FTEs. Supervisors are held accountable for their own annual departmental overtime and FTE goals. A report is shared that monitors monthly results. Supervisors are able to compare their team?s OT and FTE stats to those of their peers and budget.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Kerry Lancy said:

We have limited pay increase rates, are not authorizing any overtime, have reduced our external training budget?particularly where travel is needed?and are using more of the ABA online training resources. We have also increased the number of officers participating in operational committees of our state banking association, which is a very cost-effective way to learn and stay ?current.?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 29, 2009
Votes: +2

Write comment

busy